Small cities • 2016

Město Benešov

IČO 00231401

Good buyer. Buyer does not modify or cancel tenders which fosters competition. Considerable volume of contracts goes only to few firms.

53.
ranking
76%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

47%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Provozování vodovodu a kanalizace pro veřejnou potřebu města Benešov
Sbírání odpadních vod
4
Ø5 in industry
Zlepšení vodohospodářské infrastruktury města Benešova
Stavební práce na výstavbě čistíren odpadních vod
15
Ø5 in industry
Zateplení souboru budov SO 01 ZŠ Dukelská 1818, Benešov
Stavební úpravy školních budov
6
Ø5 in industry
"Zlepšení vodohospodářské infrastruktury města Benešov"
Stavební práce na výstavbě čistíren odpadních vod
1
Ø5 in industry
Patrová parkoviště Na Bezděkově - Bezručova II., Benešov
Výstavba parkovišť
2
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

25%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Vodohospodářská společnost Benešov, s.r.o.
1 690,269,000
Pohl cz, a.s.
2 199,726,805
Sládek Group, a.s.
3 30,042,816
B E S s.r.o.
2 9,691,964
Porr a.s.
1 8,642,538
Other suppliers 22 80,499,869

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 5)
Nonprice competition 20% (1 from 5)
Lots 0% (0 from 5)
E-auction 0% (0 from 5)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

83%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 31)
Final or estimated price not published 10% (3 from 31)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 31)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 31)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 31)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 31)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 31)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 31)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

80%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 31)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 6% (2 from 31)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 6% (2 from 31)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 31)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 31)
Supplier donating to political party 6% (2 from 31)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 16% (5 from 31)