Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Benešov

IČO 00231401

Good buyer. Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality. The supplier portfolio is relatively broad.

3.
ranking
81%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

45%
average 49%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Rekonstrukce parteru - Tyršova ulice
Výstavba, zakládání a povrchové práce pro komunikace
4
Ø7 in industry
Novostavba Mateřské školy Úsměv v Benešově - stavební práce
Stavební úpravy budov mateřských škol
5
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce a přístavba ŽS a PŠ Hodějovského Benešov
Stavební úpravy školních budov
3
Ø5 in industry
Stavební úpravy stávajícího objektu na p.p.č.534 v k.ú. Benešov u Prahy - azylový dům - dům služeb sociální prevence
Výstavba stavebních konstrukcí
9
Ø6 in industry
Zkvalitnění umělé trávy SK Benešov
Stavební úpravy v souvislosti s objekty pro sportovní hřiště
6
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

75%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
PRADAST, spol. s r.o.
1 52,680,860
KOČÍ a.s.
1 41,449,883
POHL cz, a.s.
1 27,306,914
SLÁDEK GROUP, a.s.
1 27,306,914
Stavební firma Pazdera s.r.o.
2 17,976,577
Other suppliers 15 58,507,819

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

71%
average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 67% (4 from 6)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 6)
Lots 33% (2 from 6)
E-auction 0% (0 from 6)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

83%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 1,035,466,940
Unregulated purchases 466,791,486
Total 1,502,258,426

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 91%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

75%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 1.50

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

97%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 8% (2 from 24)
Final or estimated price not published 8% (2 from 24)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 24)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 24)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 24)
Wrong buyer name 4% (1 from 24)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 24)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 24)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

80%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 90% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.43 (average mistakes per contract)