Large cities • 2016

Město Šumperk

IČO 00303461

Good buyer. There are not many contract extensions and ammendments. Tender documentation is well prepared, thus there is no need to modify or cancel the procedure.

6.
ranking
77%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

64%
average 63%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Údržba veřejných komunikací, chodníků a příslušenství na území města Šumperka.
Opravy a údržba silnic a dalších zařízení a související služby
4
Ø3 in industry
Údržba ploch a prvků veřejné zeleně na území města Šumperka.
Služby vysazování a údržby zelených ploch
3
Ø5 in industry
Údržba veřejného osvětlení na území města Šumperka
Údržba pouličního osvětlení
3
Ø4 in industry
Parkovací dům při ul. Finské, Šumperk – Temenice, II.etapa
Výstavba parkovacích garáží
4
Ø5 in industry
Cyklostezka Šumperk - Dolní Studénky
Výstavba cyklistických stezek
11
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

83%
average 76%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Evják, s.r.o.
1 96,421,792
Údržba zeleně a parků, s.r.o.
1 32,769,465
Ekozis spol. s r. o.
5 32,303,624
Elektroslužby Šumperk s.r.o.
1 28,098,532
Strabag a.s.
2 25,521,677
Other suppliers 48 196,686,618

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

67%
average 70%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 32% (9 from 28)
Nonprice competition 21% (6 from 28)
Lots 14% (4 from 28)
E-auction 0% (0 from 28)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

72%
average 57%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 411,801,713
Unregulated purchases 381,631,003
Total 793,432,716

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 77%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Rekonstrukce přednádraží v Šumperku - dodatečné stavební práce č.1
Not disclosed
86,700

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

87%
average 65%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 7%
Average requirements modifications count 0.32

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

92%
average 83%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 58)
Final or estimated price not published 9% (5 from 58)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 58)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 58)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 58)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 58)
Call and award notices contradict each other 5% (3 from 58)
Missing call for tenders 2% (1 from 58)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

67%
average 46%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 69% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.15 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

78%
average 84%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 58)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 2% (1 from 58)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 7% (4 from 58)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 58)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 58)
Supplier donating to political party 9% (5 from 58)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 7% (4 from 58)