Small cities • 2016

Město Říčany

IČO 00240702

The supplier portfolio is relatively broad. Calls for tenders are often modified or cancelled.

108.
ranking
73%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

53%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Mlýnský rybník - rekonstrukce hráze, objektů a odbahnění nádrže
Stavební práce
6
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce kmenového sběrače "A" a opevnění břehu vodoteče
Stavební práce na výstavbě kanalizačních sítí
3
Ø5 in industry
REKONSTRUKCE ŠTEFÁNIKOVY A RÝDLOVY ULICE V ŘÍČANECH
Stavební práce pro potrubní, telekomunikační a elektrické vedení, pro dálnice, silnice, přistávací plochy a železnice; zarovnávání ploch
9
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce sportovní haly
Stavební práce
3
Ø5 in industry
Dostavba areálu volnočasových aktivit obce Pacov – II. etapa II
Výstavba víceúčelových sportovních zařízení
4
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

81%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Porr a.s.
11 58,304,344
Green Place s.r.o.
4 34,415,451
Atos, spol. s r.o. Ledeč nad Sázavou
9 34,091,451
Hydro & Kov s.r.o.
1 29,999,999
Sládek Group, a.s.
3 13,807,625
Other suppliers 43 108,462,551

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

66%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 19% (5 from 26)
Nonprice competition 4% (1 from 26)
Lots 0% (0 from 26)
E-auction 8% (2 from 26)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

73%
average 84%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

44%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 30%
Cancelled contracts 11%
Average requirements modifications count 0.68

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

87%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 10% (7 from 71)
Final or estimated price not published 23% (16 from 71)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 71)
Missing supplier ID 11% (8 from 71)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 71)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 71)
Call and award notices contradict each other 4% (3 from 71)
Missing call for tenders 4% (3 from 71)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

90%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 71)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 71)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 71)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 71)
Supplier bankruptcy 3% (2 from 71)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 71)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 28% (20 from 71)