Large cities • 2016

Statutární město Most

IČO 00266094

Relatively small fraction of purchases is spent according to law. Court deemed all complaints against buyer invalid or insignificant.

14.
ranking
75%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

77%
average 63%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Tramvajový přestupní uzel v ul. Nádražní v Mostě
Výstavba silničních mostů
15
Ø5 in industry
IPRM DOPRAVA II. - Úprava řešení přednádražních prostor
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
16
Ø5 in industry
Snížení energetické náročnosti budovy Základní školy v ul. Rozmarýnová 1692, Most
Instalace a montáž dveří a oken a souvisejících výrobků
7
Ø6 in industry
IPRM DOPRAVA II. - informační systém veřejné dopravy
Informační systémy pro cestující
4
Ø1 in industry
Dodávky elektrické energie
Elektrická energie
6
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

82%
average 76%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Herkul a.s.
27 62,048,247
Eurovia Cs, a.s.
13 32,885,838
Centropol Energy, a.s.
1 23,876,307
První Hypostav spol. s r.o.
4 19,282,156
Euromont Group a.s.
4 16,718,174
Other suppliers 52 115,240,834

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

75%
average 70%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (7 from 0)
Nonprice competition 15% (4 from 27)
Division into lots 30% (8 from 27)
E-auction 15% (4 from 27)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 27)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

40%
average 57%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 270,051,564
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 1,402,798,021
Total 1,672,849,585

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

82%
average 77%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

76%
average 65%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 4%
Cancelled contracts 4%
Average requirements modifications count 0.65

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

91%
average 83%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 105)
Final or estimated price not published 59% (62 from 105)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 105)
Missing supplier ID 4% (4 from 105)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 105)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 105)
Missing call for tenders 6% (6 from 105)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 105)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 105)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

39%
average 46%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 48% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.79 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

87%
average 84%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 1% (1 from 105)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 105)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 105)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 105)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 105)
Supplier donating to political party 1% (1 from 105)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 18% (19 from 105)