Large cities • 2016

Město Cheb

IČO 00253979

Good buyer. Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality. Buyer publishes without flaws in procurement journal.

2.
ranking
79%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

67%
average 63%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Výstavba průmyslového parku – II. etapa
Výstavba silnic
8
Ø5 in industry
Revitalizace sídliště Zlatý Vrch – 1. etapa
Výstavba vedlejších komunikací
5
Ø6 in industry
Revitalizace sídliště Zlatý Vrch v Chebu 2. a 3. etapa
Výkopové a zemní práce
7
Ø4 in industry
Rekonstrukce komunikací Švédský Vrch
Výkopové a zemní práce
6
Ø4 in industry
MŠ Do Zátiší a 6. ZŠ – zateplení, výměna oken a dveří
Fasády
3
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

69%
average 76%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Algon, a.s.
9 91,499,385
Stamoza, společnost s ručením omezeným
5 23,060,603
Eurovia Cs, a.s.
2 16,121,993
Šu-str s.r.o.
1 12,395,000
Strabag a.s.
1 10,000,000
Other suppliers 29 90,373,095

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

84%
average 70%

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

46%
average 57%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 244,200,082
Unregulated purchases 919,603,221
Total 1,163,803,303

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

85%
average 77%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

73%
average 65%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 12%
Average requirements modifications count 0.55

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

99%
average 83%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 47)
Final or estimated price not published 6% (3 from 47)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 47)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 47)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 47)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 47)
Call and award notices contradict each other 4% (2 from 47)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 47)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

78%
average 46%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 81% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.14 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

86%
average 84%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 47)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 47)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 47)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 47)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 47)
Supplier donating to political party 2% (1 from 47)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 11% (5 from 47)