Large cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Cheb

IČO 00253979

Good buyer. Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality. Lot of money goes into historical contracts and unregulated purchases.

6.
ranking
80%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

63%
average 52%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Zateplení základní školy 1. ZŠ v ul. Americká 36, Cheb
Stavební práce
4
Ø5 in industry
Areál TJ Lokomotiva - Etapa I – fáze I. A - Hřiště s umělým povrchem
Výstavba víceúčelových sportovních zařízení
7
Ø4 in industry
Krajinná výstava 2016 - 2017
Krajinné úpravy
7
Ø5 in industry
Revitalizace parku – Městské sady
Chodníky a jiné zpevněné povrchy
9
Ø5 in industry
Rozvoj služeb TC ORP Cheb
Telekomunikační přístroje na přenos dat
2
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

81%
average 70%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
ISSO - Inženýrské stavby Sokolov, s.r.o.
1 28,365,374
A SPORT PRODUKT s.r.o.
1 22,399,832
Gardenline s.r.o.
1 18,359,672
ALGON, a.s.
7 17,948,634
EUROVIA CS, a.s.
3 10,830,941
Other suppliers 25 56,450,676

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

68%
average 71%

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

43%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 357,265,174
Unregulated purchases 1,577,712,173
Total 1,934,977,347

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

84%
average 87%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

88%
average 77%

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 90%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 38)
Final or estimated price not published 3% (1 from 38)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 38)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 38)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 38)
Wrong buyer name 3% (1 from 38)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 38)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 38)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

96%
average 55%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.16 (average mistakes per contract)