Small cities • 2016

Město Český Brod

IČO 00235334

Good buyer. The supplier portfolio is relatively broad. Buyer does not modify or cancel tenders which fosters competition.

45.
ranking
77%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

63%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Parkoviště P+R Český Brod II
Stavební práce
8
Ø5 in industry
Kulturní a společenské centrum Český Brod
Stavební práce
2
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce školní jídelny v Českém Brodě
Instalace a montáž vybavených kuchyní
3
Ø5 in industry
Pavilon G nemocnice Český Brod
Tepelné izolace
10
Ø6 in industry
Snižování spotřeby energie v ZŠ Žitomířská, č.p. 885, Český Brod
Stavební úpravy školních budov
5
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

76%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Barko Invest a.s.
1 15,949,974
Tost.cz, s.r.o.
3 14,864,485
Halko stavební společnost, s.r.o.
1 5,822,806
G&g Building s.r.o.
1 5,519,950
Hb Inpol, s.r.o.
1 5,286,346
Other suppliers 9 23,291,132

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

71%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 0)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 6)
Division into lots 50% (3 from 6)
E-auction 0% (0 from 6)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 6)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

90%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.40

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

91%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 16)
Final or estimated price not published 6% (1 from 16)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 16)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 16)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 16)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 16)
Missing call for tenders 6% (1 from 16)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 16)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 16)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

90%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 16)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 16)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 16)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 16)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 16)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 16)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 25% (4 from 16)