Large cities • 2016

Statutární město Přerov

IČO 00301825

Uncompetitive procedures are overused. Buyer profile has high number of errors.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

42%
average 63%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Městská autobusová doprava v Přerově 2013 - 2023
Služby veřejné silniční dopravy
2
Ø3 in industry
Zajištění přenosu dat a informací v územní samosprávě města Přerova
Informační technologie: poradenství, vývoj programového vybavení, internet a podpora
2
Ø2 in industry
Lávka U Tenisu
Stavební úpravy mostů
1
Ø5 in industry
Pojištění nemovitého a movitého majetku a odpovědnosti za újmu statutárního města Přerova
Pojištění
3
Ø2 in industry
Zajištění energetických úspor objektu Základní školy U Tenisu
Stavební úpravy školních budov
12
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

68%
average 76%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Dopravní a logistická společnost s.r.o.
1 136,781,455
Tesco Sw a.s.
1 113,997,500
Pss Přerovská stavební a.s.
6 27,745,012
Kooperativa pojišťovna, a.s., Vienna Insurance Group
2 23,819,139
Firesta-fišer, rekonstrukce, stavby a.s.
2 20,030,337
Other suppliers 35 121,812,443

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

67%
average 57%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 444,916,906
Unregulated purchases 537,811,051
Total 982,727,957

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

30%
average 77%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

60%
average 65%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 28%
Average requirements modifications count 0.67

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

99%
average 83%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 2% (1 from 47)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 47)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 47)
Missing supplier ID 4% (2 from 47)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 47)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 47)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 47)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 47)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

0%
average 46%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 0% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.09 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

97%
average 84%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 47)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 47)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 47)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 47)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 47)
Supplier donating to political party 4% (2 from 47)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 13% (6 from 47)