Small cities • 2016

Město Nová Paka

IČO 00271888

Considerable volume of contracts goes only to few firms. Calls for tenders are often modified or cancelled.

91.
ranking
74%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

72%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Sportovně regenerační centrum v Nové Pace
Stavební práce
10
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce ul. U Stadionu a revitalizace lokality Jírových sadů
Stavební práce
2
Ø5 in industry
Kompostárna bioodpadu - technika
Traktory
3
Ø3 in industry
Oprava fasády a výměna oken objektu č.p.1, Oprava věže č.p.1, Masarykovo náměstí 1
Stavební práce
4
Ø5 in industry
Kompostárna bioodpadu – stavební část
Stavební práce
3
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

28%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Metrostav a.s.
1 66,534,398
Matex Hk s.r.o.
1 16,250,993
Strom Praha a.s.
1 4,613,000
Dkk Stav s.r.o.
1 3,548,042
Strabag a.s.
1 2,818,070
Other suppliers 6 6,893,489

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

79%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 50% (1 from 2)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 2)
Lots 0% (0 from 2)
E-auction 0% (0 from 2)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

50%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 33%
Average requirements modifications count 1.00

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

98%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 11)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 11)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 11)
Missing supplier ID 9% (1 from 11)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 11)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 11)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 11)
Missing call for tenders 9% (1 from 11)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

83%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 11)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 11)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 18% (2 from 11)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 11)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 11)
Supplier donating to political party 9% (1 from 11)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 18% (2 from 11)