Large cities • 2016

Město Blansko

IČO 00279943

Lot of money goes into historical contracts and unregulated purchases.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

54%
average 63%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Blansko, Salmova 17 – energetické úspory
Stavební práce
6
Ø5 in industry
Snížení energetické náročnosti městského úřadu v Blansku
Stavební úpravy prostorů pro zaměstnance
5
Ø5 in industry
Snížení energetické náročnosti budovy ZŠ Dvorská 26, Blansko
Stavební úpravy školních budov
4
Ø5 in industry
Blansko, ulice Nádraží, parkoviště osobních automobilů
Stavební práce
5
Ø5 in industry
Výměna zdroje vytápění v objektu ZŠ a MŠ Salmova, Blansko
Tepelná čerpadla
3
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

77%
average 76%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Stavkom, spol. s r. o.
1 19,825,740
Dopravní stavby Brno, s.r.o.
2 17,709,615
Reko a.s.
1 13,591,887
Letostav, spol. s r.o.
1 13,494,690
Cergomont s.r.o.
1 7,979,699
Other suppliers 11 27,971,226

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 70%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 0)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 8)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 8)
E-auction 0% (0 from 8)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 8)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

31%
average 57%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 100,572,860
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 933,849,068
Total 1,034,421,928

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 77%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Stavební práce – Demolice hotelu Dukla - vícepráce 01
Dodatečné práce
- 69,174
Snížení energetické náročnosti objektu mateřské školy Údolní v Blansku - dodatečné stavební práce
Dodatečné práce
- Not disclosed

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

67%
average 65%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 8%
Cancelled contracts 25%
Average requirements modifications count 0.08

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

92%
average 83%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 18)
Final or estimated price not published 17% (3 from 18)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 18)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 18)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 18)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 18)
Missing call for tenders 11% (2 from 18)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 18)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 18)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

22%
average 46%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 48% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 2.17 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

63%
average 84%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 18)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 18)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 6% (1 from 18)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 18)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 18)
Supplier donating to political party 22% (4 from 18)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 33% (6 from 18)