Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Třebechovice pod Orebem

IČO 00269719

Buyer does not avoid following procurement law. Buyer profile lacks mandatory machine readability.

66.
ranking
70%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

79%
average 49%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

71%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
VALC, s.r.o.
3 11,829,124
SPS - VKP s.r.o.
1 6,843,700
UNI – GIPS spol. s r.o.
3 6,194,831
Ateliéry Bárta s.r.o.
1 6,110,000
MATEX HK s.r.o.
2 2,712,830
Other suppliers 4 9,010,533

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 40% (2 from 5)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 5)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 5)
E-auction 0% (0 from 5)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 5)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

100%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 219,598,807
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 0
Total 55,277,574

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

85%
average 91%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Stavební úpravy Kulturního domu - II. etapa (vícepráce 2)
Emergency
- 755,282
Stavební úpravy Kulturního domu - II. etapa (vícepráce)
Additional works
- 374,198
Stavební úpravy čp. 528, objekt B (II.NP),Třebechovice p.O. (vícepráce)
Emergency
- 356,567
Stavební úpravy Kulturního domu – vícepráce
Additional works
- 235,091
Stavební úpravy čp. 528, objekt B (II.NP),Třebechovice p.O. (vícepráce 2)
Emergency
- 32,504

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

55%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 40%
Average requirements modifications count 0.80

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

87%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 16)
Final or estimated price not published 6% (1 from 16)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 16)
Missing supplier ID 6% (1 from 16)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 16)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 16)
Missing call for tenders 12% (2 from 16)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 16)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 16)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

5%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 71% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 2.64 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 14 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders