Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Třebechovice pod Orebem

IČO 00269719

Buyer does not avoid following procurement law. Buyer profile lacks mandatory machine readability.

66.
ranking
70%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

79%
average 49%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Stavební úpravy Kulturního domu - II. etapa
Stavební práce
16
Ø5 in industry
Vybavení JSDH Třebechovice pod Orebem k řešení následků klimatických změn
Cisternové automobilové stříkačky
3
Ø2 in industry
Generální restaurování NKP Třebechovického betlému
Umělecké služby
1
Ø2 in industry
Stavební úpravy čp. 528, objekt B (II.NP), Třebechovice p.O.
Stavební práce
13
Ø5 in industry
Stavební úpravy Kulturního domu
Stavební práce
7
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

71%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
VALC, s.r.o.
3 11,829,124
SPS - VKP s.r.o.
1 6,843,700
UNI – GIPS spol. s r.o.
3 6,194,831
Ateliéry Bárta s.r.o.
1 6,110,000
MATEX HK s.r.o.
2 2,712,830
Other suppliers 4 9,010,533

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 40% (2 from 5)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 5)
Lots 0% (0 from 5)
E-auction 0% (0 from 5)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

100%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 219,598,807
Unregulated purchases -164,321,234
Total 55,277,574

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

85%
average 91%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

55%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 40%
Average requirements modifications count 0.80

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

87%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 16)
Final or estimated price not published 6% (1 from 16)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 16)
Missing supplier ID 6% (1 from 16)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 16)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 16)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 16)
Missing call for tenders 12% (2 from 16)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

5%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 71% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 2.64 (average mistakes per contract)