Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Broumov

IČO 00272523

Buyer profile lacks mandatory machine readability. Buyer recieves unusually small ammount of bids.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

32%
average 49%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Dopravní terminál Broumov
Stavby sloužící dopravě
3
Ø10 in industry
Komunitní dům seniorů
Stavební práce
6
Ø5 in industry
Komunitní centrum Broumov
Stavební práce
1
Ø5 in industry
Novostavba smuteční síně Broumov
Stavební úpravy zařízení sociální péče
4
Ø5 in industry
Výběrové řízení na dodavatele stavebních prací pro projekt: Zlepšení tepelně-izolačních vlastností ZŠ Masarykova, Broumov
Stavební práce
5
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

71%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
PSG DS a.s.
1 15,962,999
BROUMSTAV společnost s ručením omezeným
1 14,416,749
Broumovské stavební sdružení s.r.o.
1 13,309,228
WRAPPED group Im, s.r.o.
1 9,395,896
KERSON spol. s r.o.
1 7,800,147
Other suppliers 6 11,194,890

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 3)
Nonprice competition 33% (1 from 3)
Lots 0% (0 from 3)
E-auction 0% (0 from 3)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

61%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 163,327,352
Unregulated purchases 269,643,387
Total 432,970,738

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

96%
average 91%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

67%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 33%
Average requirements modifications count 0.33

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

91%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 13)
Final or estimated price not published 23% (3 from 13)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 13)
Missing supplier ID 8% (1 from 13)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 13)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 13)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 13)
Missing call for tenders 23% (3 from 13)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

2%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 33% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.25 (average mistakes per contract)