Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Kyjov

IČO 00285030

The competition for contracts is low. Buyer profile lacks mandatory machine readability.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

8%
average 49%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
„Regenerace panelového sídliště, U Vodojemu, Kyjov – II. etapa“
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
3
Ø7 in industry
Městská autobusová doprava Kyjov 2017 - 2026
Služby veřejné silniční dopravy
1
Ø2 in industry
Příjezdová komunikace ke Šroubárnám Kyjov III
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
6
Ø7 in industry
"Snížení energetické náročnosti budovy mateřské školy Boršovská ve městě Kyjov"
Stavební práce
3
Ø5 in industry
„Stavební úpravy městské knihovny Kyjov“
Stavební práce
2
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

80%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
SWIETELSKY stavební s.r.o., odštěpný závod Dopravní stavby MORAVA
1 16,610,000
ČSAD Kyjov a.s.
1 16,000,000
Společnost příjezdová komunikace ke Šroubárnám Kyjov III – Porr – MSO servis
1 14,770,716
MSO servis spol. s r.o.
1 13,988,942
Kala, spol. s r.o.
1 13,881,488
Other suppliers 6 41,810,326

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

87%
average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 29% (2 from 7)
Nonprice competition 43% (3 from 7)
Lots 0% (0 from 7)
E-auction 43% (3 from 7)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

64%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 243,750,920
Unregulated purchases 354,593,566
Total 598,344,486

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

74%
average 91%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Most M08 - ul. Za Humny
Not disclosed
8,621,034

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

82%
average 77%

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

91%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 12)
Final or estimated price not published 17% (2 from 12)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 12)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 12)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 12)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 12)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 12)
Missing call for tenders 8% (1 from 12)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

0%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 27% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.27 (average mistakes per contract)