Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Kyjov

IČO 00285030

The competition for contracts is low. Buyer profile lacks mandatory machine readability.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

8%
average 49%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

80%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
SWIETELSKY stavební s.r.o., odštěpný závod Dopravní stavby MORAVA
1 16,610,000
ČSAD Kyjov a.s.
1 16,000,000
Společnost příjezdová komunikace ke Šroubárnám Kyjov III – Porr – MSO servis
1 14,770,716
MSO servis spol. s r.o.
1 13,988,942
Kala, spol. s r.o.
1 13,881,488
Other suppliers 6 41,810,326

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

87%
average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 29% (2 from 7)
Nonprice competition 43% (3 from 7)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 7)
E-auction 43% (3 from 7)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 7)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

64%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 243,750,920
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 354,593,566
Total 598,344,486

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

74%
average 91%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Most M08 - ul. Za Humny
Not disclosed
Not disclosed Not disclosed

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

82%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 14%
Average requirements modifications count 1.00

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

91%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 12)
Final or estimated price not published 17% (2 from 12)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 12)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 12)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 12)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 12)
Missing call for tenders 8% (1 from 12)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 12)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 12)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

0%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 27% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.27 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 11 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders