Small cities • 2016

Město Vrchlabí

IČO 00278475

Tender documentation is well prepared, thus there is no need to modify or cancel the procedure. Procurement jounal notices do not contain many mistakes.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

78%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Rozšíření průmyslové zóny Vrchlabí-jih-zhotovitel stavby-Fotbalový areál Vejsplachy
Demolice a zemní práce
9
Ø4 in industry
Rozšíření průmyslové zóny Vrchlabí - jih - zhotovitel - Opatření na Vápenickém potoku
Výstavba odvodňovacích kanálů
10
Ø8 in industry
Vrchlabí - Krkonošská ul. I. etapa
Výstavba, zakládání a povrchové práce pro komunikace
15
Ø6 in industry
Vrchlabí_Jihoslovanská ulice_rekonstrukce komunikace, parkoviště
Práce na opravě silnic
4
Ø5 in industry
Vrchlabí, Liščí Kopec "JIH", technická vybavenost pro RD - 1.část
Výstavba, zakládání a povrchové práce pro komunikace
9
Ø6 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

45%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Chládek a Tintěra, Pardubice a.s.
6 131,370,228
M - Silnice a.s.
6 32,524,732
Bak stavební společnost, a.s.
1 16,684,259
Eurovia Cs, a.s.
1 9,506,737
Obis, spol. s r.o.
1 8,555,902
Other suppliers 12 40,323,676

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

61%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 50% (2 from 4)
Nonprice competition 25% (1 from 4)
Lots 0% (0 from 4)
E-auction 0% (0 from 4)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

72%
average 84%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

94%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.25

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

99%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 27)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 27)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 27)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 27)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 27)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 27)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 27)
Missing call for tenders 4% (1 from 27)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

71%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 27)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 27)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 27)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 27)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 27)
Supplier donating to political party 11% (3 from 27)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 15% (4 from 27)