Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Vrchlabí

IČO 00278475

Procurement journal misses vital information (prices, suppliers..). Tender documentation is well prepared, thus there is no need to modify or cancel the procedure.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

28%
average 49%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
INTENZIFIKACE ÚPRAVNY VODY HERLÍKOVICE
Water-treatment work
3
Ø7 in industry
Vrchlabí – náměstí Míru – zhotovitel stavby
Road construction works
3
Ø8 in industry
Nábřeží Labská
Road-repair works
10
Ø6 in industry
Nábřeží Labská

10
Ø6 in industry
Vrchlabí_Jihoslovanská ulice_rekonstrukce komunikace, parkoviště

4
Ø6 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

37%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
M-SILNICE a.s.
8 79,623,252
polečnost „MTS a VODA CZ pro intenzifikaci UV Herlíkovice“
1 69,945,798
Chládek a Tintěra, Pardubice a.s.
5 9,375,712
Gardenline s.r.o.
1 8,565,925
PAS Natura s.r.o.
1 2,496,400
Other suppliers 2 445,521

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 50% (1 from 2)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 3)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 3)
E-auction 0% (0 from 3)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 3)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

76%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 388,921,179
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 280,038,169
Total 668,959,348

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

77%
average 91%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

65%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 20)
Final or estimated price not published 10% (2 from 20)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 20)
Missing supplier ID 10% (2 from 20)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 20)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 20)
Missing call for tenders 10% (2 from 20)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 20)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 20)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

51%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 75% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.95 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 20 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders