Large cities • 2016

Statutární město Pardubice

IČO 00274046

Buyer profile is in relatively good shape. The competition for contracts is high.

14.
ranking
75%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

85%
average 63%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Pěší zóna Tř. Míru - Sladkovského
Stavební práce
14
Ø5 in industry
Revitalizace Tyršových sadů a revitalizace podzámeckého biotopu
Stavební práce
9
Ø5 in industry
Revitalizace parku na Špici v Pardubicích
Stavební práce
7
Ø5 in industry
Pojištění nemovitého a movitého majetku a odpovědnosti za škodu statutárního města Pardubice
Pojištění
3
Ø2 in industry
ZŠ Družstevní, Polabiny - realizace úspor energií
Stavební práce
7
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

85%
average 76%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Syner, s.r.o.
3 104,073,257
Bak stavební společnost, a.s.
4 93,473,200
Colas Cz, a.s.
6 55,945,000
Gardenline s.r.o.
5 37,231,338
Prima spol. s r.o.
3 35,357,071
Other suppliers 64 288,104,619

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

66%
average 70%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 62% (24 from 39)
Nonprice competition 5% (2 from 39)
Lots 5% (2 from 39)
E-auction 0% (0 from 39)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

51%
average 57%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 616,991,455
Unregulated purchases 1,771,066,354
Total 2,388,057,809

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

87%
average 77%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

64%
average 65%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 4%
Cancelled contracts 13%
Average requirements modifications count 0.81

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

93%
average 83%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 2% (2 from 87)
Final or estimated price not published 25% (22 from 87)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 87)
Missing supplier ID 7% (6 from 87)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 87)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 87)
Call and award notices contradict each other 1% (1 from 87)
Missing call for tenders 3% (3 from 87)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

69%
average 46%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 85% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.74 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

78%
average 84%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 1% (1 from 87)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 3% (3 from 87)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 87)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 87)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 87)
Supplier donating to political party 8% (7 from 87)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 11% (10 from 87)