Large cities • 2018 • past ranking

Statutární město Pardubice

IČO 00274046

Good buyer. Buyer profile is in relatively good shape. Small number of firms does not recieve majority of contracts.

8.
ranking
79%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

40%
average 52%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Multimodální uzel veřejné dopravy v Pardubicích
Stavební práce
4
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce budovy radnice
Rekonstrukce budov
2
Ø4 in industry
Rekonstrukce kuchyně pro SSmP a dodávka gastro vybavení
Stavební práce
1
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce kuchyně pro SSmP a dodávka gastro vybavení
Kuchyňské zařízení, domácí potřeby a zařízení pro pohostinství
1
Ø2 in industry
Prostor před KD Dukla (stavební úpravy ul. Gorkého v úseku ul. Čs. armády – Jana Palacha)
Stavební práce
10
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

82%
average 70%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
STRABAG a.s.
1 145,975,195
MARHOLD a.s.
3 57,067,032
CHRPA stavební společnost s r.o. Pardubice
4 35,120,051
EUROVIA CS, a.s.
3 32,334,008
MIROS MAJETKOVÁ a.s.
4 30,363,947
Other suppliers 57 266,737,275

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

70%
average 71%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 41% (21 from 51)
Nonprice competition 12% (6 from 51)
Lots 12% (6 from 51)
E-auction 0% (0 from 51)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

50%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 1,065,104,830
Unregulated purchases 3,191,303,074
Total 4,256,407,904

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

94%
average 87%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

83%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 2%
Cancelled contracts 10%
Average requirements modifications count 0.49

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

99%
average 90%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 4% (3 from 80)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 80)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 80)
Missing supplier ID 2% (2 from 80)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 80)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 80)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 80)
Missing call for tenders 1% (1 from 80)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

89%
average 55%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 98% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.38 (average mistakes per contract)