Large cities • 2016

Statutární město Kladno

IČO 00234516

Buyer profile has high number of errors.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

75%
average 63%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Rozšíření využitelnosti historické budovy Městského divadla Kladno
Stavební úpravy budov sloužících pro volný čas, sporty, kulturu, ubytování a restaurace
7
Ø4 in industry
Revitalizace brownfieldu - Kasárna Kladno
Stavební práce
6
Ø5 in industry
Sanace staré ekologické zátěže v průmyslové zóně Kladno-Dubí
Sanace průmyslových zón
12
Ø4 in industry
Rekonstrukce komunikace a chodníků v lokalitě Staré Kročehlavy
Obnova povrchu vozovky
5
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce komunikace včetně mostní konstrukce v Průmyslové ulici v Kladně
Obnova povrchu vozovky
5
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

85%
average 76%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
S u b t e r r a a.s.
1 94,299,999
Metrostav a.s.
1 51,641,621
Strabag a.s.
3 45,886,242
Alfa System s.r.o.
1 38,791,258
Ave Kladno s.r.o.
3 26,395,079
Other suppliers 40 235,764,557

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

69%
average 70%

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

42%
average 57%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 492,778,760
Zakazky maleho rozsahu 0
Unregulated purchases 2,301,725,364
Total 2,794,504,124

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 77%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

63%
average 65%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 14%
Cancelled contracts 5%
Average requirements modifications count 0.88

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

80%
average 83%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 49)
Final or estimated price not published 31% (15 from 49)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 49)
Missing supplier ID 2% (1 from 49)
Missing buyer ID 2% (1 from 49)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 49)
Missing call for tenders 22% (11 from 49)
Zakazka nema viteznou cenu 0% ( from 49)
Cena byla aktualizovana 0% ( from 49)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

15%
average 46%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 33% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 2.15 (average mistakes per contract)
Uveřejňují se na profilu zakázky malého rozsahu? (Poměřujeme proti počtu zakázek v režimu zákona)
0-250K 0 zakázek
250K-500K 0 zakázek
500K-1000K 0 zakázek
1000K+ 0 zakázek

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

88%
average 84%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 49)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 49)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 2% (1 from 49)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 49)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 49)
Supplier donating to political party 8% (4 from 49)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 10% (5 from 49)