Buyer profile has high number of errors.
Is the level of competition satisfactory? detailed info
Largest contracts Industry |
Bids |
---|---|
Rozšíření využitelnosti historické budovy Městského divadla Kladno
Stavební úpravy budov sloužících pro volný čas, sporty, kulturu, ubytování a restaurace |
7
Ø4 in industry |
Revitalizace brownfieldu - Kasárna Kladno
Stavební práce |
6
Ø5 in industry |
Sanace staré ekologické zátěže v průmyslové zóně Kladno-Dubí
Sanace průmyslových zón |
12
Ø4 in industry |
Rekonstrukce komunikace a chodníků v lokalitě Staré Kročehlavy
Obnova povrchu vozovky |
5
Ø5 in industry |
Rekonstrukce komunikace včetně mostní konstrukce v Průmyslové ulici v Kladně
Obnova povrchu vozovky |
5
Ø5 in industry |
Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms? detailed info
Largest suppliers | Contracts count | Contracts volume Kč |
---|---|---|
S u b t e r r a a.s. |
1 | 94,299,999 |
Metrostav a.s. |
1 | 51,641,621 |
Strabag a.s. |
3 | 45,886,242 |
Alfa System s.r.o. |
1 | 38,791,258 |
Ave Kladno s.r.o. |
3 | 26,395,079 |
Other suppliers | 40 | 235,764,557 |
Supplier | Contracts count | Contracts volume (Kč) |
---|---|---|
S u b t e r r a a.s. |
1 | 94,299,999 |
Metrostav a.s. |
1 | 51,641,621 |
Strabag a.s. |
3 | 45,886,242 |
Alfa System s.r.o. |
1 | 38,791,258 |
Ave Kladno s.r.o. |
3 | 26,395,079 |
Ekostavby Louny s.r.o. |
1 | 24,738,200 |
Pontech s.r.o. |
1 | 23,790,000 |
Raeder & Falge s.r.o. |
1 | 21,483,440 |
Centropol Energy, a.s. |
2 | 16,766,079 |
Energie - stavební a báňská a.s. |
1 | 16,400,651 |
B & J Holding,a.s. |
1 | 14,012,051 |
Pražská plynárenská, a.s. |
4 | 12,332,849 |
Sportovní Podlahy Zlín, s.r.o. |
1 | 12,155,360 |
Prolemax s.r.o. |
1 | 10,894,797 |
Čez Prodej, s.r.o. |
1 | 10,693,368 |
Výstavba sítí Kolín a.s. |
1 | 8,500,571 |
L I N E T spol. s r.o. |
1 | 7,132,399 |
Cgm Czech a.s. |
1 | 6,684,324 |
Elektromontáže Stavby s.r.o. |
1 | 6,394,035 |
Lama energy a.s. |
2 | 6,002,459 |
Ing. Martin Homer |
1 | 5,966,903 |
Artea Cz, a.s. |
2 | 5,762,358 |
Rwe Energie, s.r.o. |
1 | 3,794,084 |
Mao a.s. |
1 | 2,977,954 |
Lumius, spol. s r.o. |
2 | 2,615,444 |
Stavitelství Kladno spol. s r.o. |
1 | 2,541,833 |
Pragoplyn, a.s. |
2 | 2,528,591 |
Vanderlaan s.r.o. |
1 | 2,237,789 |
Jp-kontakt, s.r.o. |
1 | 2,212,158 |
K-net Technical International Group, s.r.o. |
1 | 1,745,000 |
G-servis Praha spol. s r.o. |
1 | 1,582,200 |
Marbes Consulting s.r.o. |
2 | 1,388,000 |
Intelis, s.r.o. |
1 | 855,000 |
Datasys s.r.o. |
1 | 799,100 |
Divadelní služby Plzeň s.r.o. |
1 | 621,560 |
Tgk - technika, sklo a umění s.r.o. |
1 | 156,000 |
Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools? detailed info
Tool | Contracts count |
---|---|
Extended deadlines | 0% (5 from 0) |
Nonprice competition | 44% (8 from 18) |
Division into lots | 0% (0 from 18) |
E-auction | 0% (0 from 18) |
Innovative procedure | 0% ( from 18) |
What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law? detailed info
Purchases | Volume (Kč) |
---|---|
Public procurement | 492,778,760 |
Small scale tenders | 0 |
Unregulated purchases | 2,301,725,364 |
Total | 2,794,504,124 |
Did buyer violate law significantly? detailed info
How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures? detailed info
Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications? detailed info
Type of flaw | Result |
---|---|
Issued tenders without published result | 14% |
Cancelled contracts | 5% |
Average requirements modifications count | 0.88 |
Does buyer publish vital data in official journal? detailed info
Type of flaw | Contracts count |
---|---|
Bidders count not published | 0% (0 from 49) |
Final or estimated price not published | 31% (15 from 49) |
Procedure type not published | 0% (0 from 49) |
Missing supplier ID | 2% (1 from 49) |
Missing buyer ID | 2% (1 from 49) |
Wrong buyer name | 0% (0 from 49) |
Missing call for tenders | 22% (11 from 49) |
Missing winning price | 0% ( from 49) |
Contract modification by more than 50 % | 0% ( from 49) |
Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements? detailed info
Check | Result | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? | 33% (contracts) | ||||||||||||
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? | 2.15 (average mistakes per contract) | ||||||||||||
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of tenders under the law) |
|
Do the risky firms win frequently? detailed info
Type of flaw | Contracts count |
---|---|
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award | 0% (0 from 49) |
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement | 0% (0 from 49) |
Subcontractor share above 50 % | 2% (1 from 49) |
Supplier demise shortly after contract | 0% (0 from 49) |
Supplier bankruptcy | 0% (0 from 49) |
Supplier donating to political party | 8% (4 from 49) |
Supplier did not publish financial results on time | 10% (5 from 49) |