Small cities • 2016

Město Rýmařov

IČO 00296317

Small number of firms does not recieve majority of contracts. Tender documentation is well prepared, thus there is no need to modify or cancel the procedure.

91.
ranking
74%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

58%
average 59%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

71%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Kareta s.r.o.
4 47,142,448
Čez Prodej, s.r.o.
1 33,852,234
Rýmstav Cz spol. s r.o.
2 14,030,036
Hydrospol, spol. s r.o.
3 13,948,036
Right Power Energy, s.r.o.
2 12,623,301
Other suppliers 21 39,620,888

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

80%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Nákup elektřiny NN pro město Rýmařov, obce Rýmařovska a společnosti, které město Rýmařov ovládá
Not disclosed
- 8,733,198

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

85%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 18%
Average requirements modifications count 0.30

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

75%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 6% (2 from 33)
Final or estimated price not published 21% (7 from 33)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 33)
Missing supplier ID 6% (2 from 33)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 33)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 33)
Missing call for tenders 12% (4 from 33)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 33)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 33)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

96%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 33)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 33)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 3% (1 from 33)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 33)
Supplier bankruptcy 9% (3 from 33)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 33)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 15% (5 from 33)