Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Rýmařov

IČO 00296317

Buyer divides contracts into lots to foster participation of SME's Buyer profile lacks mandatory machine readability.

66.
ranking
70%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

26%
average 49%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Rekonstrukce autobusového nádraží a parkoviště před SVČ a Stavební úpravy Školního náměstí v Rýmařově
Stavební práce
1
Ø5 in industry
Stavební úpravy komunikací v Rýmařově
Stavební práce pro potrubní, telekomunikační a elektrické vedení, pro dálnice, silnice, přistávací plochy a železnice
10
Ø6 in industry
Regenerace bytového domu Okružní 3, 5 Rýmařov
Opravy a modernizace budov
2
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce autobusového nádraží a parkoviště před SVČ a Stavební úpravy Školního náměstí v Rýmařově
Stavební práce
4
Ø5 in industry
Regenerace ulice Jungmanova
Výstavba parkovišť
6
Ø6 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

65%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
ČEZ Prodej, s.r.o.
1 33,852,235
KARETA s.r.o.
2 27,014,559
LANEX Olomouc s.r.o.
2 9,333,125
HYDROSPOL, spol. s r.o.
1 5,698,268
AWT Rekultivace a.s.
1 4,561,726
Other suppliers 11 22,579,016

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

100%
average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 33% (1 from 3)
Nonprice competition 33% (1 from 3)
Lots 67% (2 from 3)
E-auction 33% (1 from 3)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

61%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 203,691,386
Unregulated purchases 344,691,131
Total 548,382,517

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 91%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

92%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 1.00

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

83%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 6% (1 from 18)
Final or estimated price not published 17% (3 from 18)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 18)
Missing supplier ID 6% (1 from 18)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 18)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 18)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 18)
Missing call for tenders 6% (1 from 18)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

0%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 0% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.00 (average mistakes per contract)