Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Rýmařov

IČO 00296317

Buyer divides contracts into lots to foster participation of SME's Buyer profile lacks mandatory machine readability.

66.
ranking
70%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

26%
average 49%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

65%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
ČEZ Prodej, s.r.o.
1 33,852,235
KARETA s.r.o.
2 27,014,559
LANEX Olomouc s.r.o.
2 9,333,125
HYDROSPOL, spol. s r.o.
1 5,698,268
AWT Rekultivace a.s.
1 4,561,726
Other suppliers 11 22,579,016

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

100%
average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 33% (1 from 3)
Nonprice competition 33% (1 from 3)
Division into lots 67% (2 from 3)
E-auction 33% (1 from 3)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 3)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

61%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 203,691,386
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 344,691,131
Total 548,382,517

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 91%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

92%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 1.00

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

83%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 6% (1 from 18)
Final or estimated price not published 17% (3 from 18)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 18)
Missing supplier ID 6% (1 from 18)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 18)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 18)
Missing call for tenders 6% (1 from 18)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 18)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 18)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

0%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 0% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.00 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 18 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders