Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Rýmařov

IČO 00296317

Buyer divides contracts into lots to foster participation of SME's Buyer profile lacks mandatory machine readability.


Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

average 49%
Largest contracts
Rekonstrukce autobusového nádraží a parkoviště před SVČ a Stavební úpravy Školního náměstí v Rýmařově
Construction work
Ø5 in industry
Stavební úpravy komunikací v Rýmařově
Construction work for pipelines, communication and power lines, for highways, roads, airfields and railways; flatwork
Ø6 in industry
Regenerace bytového domu Okružní 3, 5 Rýmařov
Overhaul and refurbishment work
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce autobusového nádraží a parkoviště před SVČ a Stavební úpravy Školního náměstí v Rýmařově
Construction work
Ø5 in industry
Regenerace ulice Jungmanova
Parking lot construction work
Ø6 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
ČEZ Prodej, s.r.o.
1 33,852,235
KARETA s.r.o.
2 27,014,559
LANEX Olomouc s.r.o.
2 9,333,125
HYDROSPOL, spol. s r.o.
1 5,698,268
AWT Rekultivace a.s.
1 4,561,726
Other suppliers 11 22,579,016

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 33% (1 from 3)
Nonprice competition 33% (1 from 3)
Division into lots 67% (2 from 3)
E-auction 33% (1 from 3)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 3)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 203,691,386
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 344,691,131
Total 548,382,517

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

average 91%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 1.00

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 6% (1 from 18)
Final or estimated price not published 17% (3 from 18)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 18)
Missing supplier ID 6% (1 from 18)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 18)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 18)
Missing call for tenders 6% (1 from 18)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 18)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 18)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 0% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.00 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 18 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders