Small cities • 2016

Město Letohrad

IČO 00279129

Tender documentation is well prepared, thus there is no need to modify or cancel the procedure. Procurement journal misses vital information (prices, suppliers..).

144.
ranking
71%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

63%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Lokalita pro bydlení Letohrad - U Bažantnice, I. etapa
Stavební práce
17
Ø5 in industry
Červená - kanalizace a ČOV k.ú. Červená
Stavební práce na výstavbě kanalizace
6
Ø5 in industry
Realizace úspor energií - zateplení MŠ U Dvora, Letohrad
Stavební práce
3
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce místních komunikací, I. etapa
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
4
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce místních komunikací Letohrad - Kunčice
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
6
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

67%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Vodohospodářské stavby, společnost s ručením omezeným
1 25,883,883
V A K S T A V spol. s r. o. Jablonné n. Orlicí
1 9,689,607
Marhold a.s.
1 7,985,028
Strabag a.s.
2 7,704,614
Skanska a.s.
1 4,481,706
Other suppliers 8 17,324,495

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

61%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 67% (2 from 3)
Nonprice competition 33% (1 from 3)
Lots 0% (0 from 3)
E-auction 0% (0 from 3)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

62%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 14)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 14)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 14)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 14)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 14)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 14)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 14)
Missing call for tenders 57% (8 from 14)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

90%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 14)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 14)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 14)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 14)
Supplier bankruptcy 7% (1 from 14)
Supplier donating to political party 14% (2 from 14)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 7% (1 from 14)