Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Letohrad

IČO 00279129

Tender documentation is well prepared, thus there is no need to modify or cancel the procedure. The competition for contracts is high.

34.
ranking
74%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

68%
average 49%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Lokalita pro bydlení Letohrad - U Bažantnice, I. etapa
Stavební práce
17
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce komunikací 2016 - 2018
Stavební práce
10
Ø5 in industry
Červená - kanalizace a ČOV k.ú. Červená
Stavební práce na výstavbě kanalizace
6
Ø7 in industry
Cisternová automobilová stříkačka pro JSDH Letohrad
Cisternové automobilové stříkačky
1
Ø2 in industry
Provozování svozu směsného komunálního odpadu v období od 1.1.2017 do 31.12.2021
Odvoz odpadu
2
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

65%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Vodohospodářské stavby, společnost s ručením omezeným
1 25,883,884
KENVI CZ s.r.o.
1 12,541,861
VAKSTAV spol. s r.o. Jablonné n. Orlicí
1 9,689,607
WISS CZECH, s.r.o.
1 5,985,100
EKOLA České Libchavy s.r.o.
1 4,410,000
Other suppliers 4 13,715,618

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 25% (1 from 4)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 4)
Lots 0% (0 from 4)
E-auction 0% (0 from 4)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

55%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 100,220,711
Unregulated purchases 237,171,642
Total 337,392,353

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 91%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

82%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 10)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 10)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 10)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 10)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 10)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 10)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 10)
Missing call for tenders 40% (4 from 10)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

45%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 60% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.60 (average mistakes per contract)