Large cities • 2016

Statutární město Děčín

IČO 00261238

Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality. Large volume of money is spent without open competition.

14.
ranking
75%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

60%
average 63%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Rekonstrukce domova pro seniory, Děčín II, Kamenická 755/195
Stavební práce
11
Ø5 in industry
Revitalizace sídliště Děčín III-Staré Město, veřejné prostranství - 2. část
Výstavba, zakládání a povrchové práce pro komunikace
8
Ø6 in industry
Dodávka elektrické energie pro statutární město Děčín a jím zřízené organizace
Elektrická energie
4
Ø4 in industry
Revitalizace sídliště Děčín III – Staré Město, veřejné prostranství – 4. část
Výstavba, zakládání a povrchové práce pro komunikace
4
Ø6 in industry
JŘBU - Pojištění majetku, odpovědnosti za škodu a pojištění motorových vozidel.
Pojištění majetku
1
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

79%
average 76%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Strabag Rail a.s.
5 45,280,993
Insky spol. s r.o.
6 32,772,458
Amper Market, a.s.
1 19,096,220
Strabag a.s.
3 14,537,910
Bohuslav Čepila
2 10,735,278
Other suppliers 27 72,161,835

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

45%
average 57%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 200,772,165
Unregulated purchases 783,418,514
Total 984,190,678

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

53%
average 77%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

54%
average 65%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 4%
Cancelled contracts 33%
Average requirements modifications count 0.52

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

98%
average 83%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 2% (1 from 45)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 45)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 45)
Missing supplier ID 2% (1 from 45)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 45)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 45)
Call and award notices contradict each other 2% (1 from 45)
Missing call for tenders 2% (1 from 45)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

90%
average 46%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 93% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.11 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

89%
average 84%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 45)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 45)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 45)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 45)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 45)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 45)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 29% (13 from 45)