Small cities • 2016

Město Železný Brod

IČO 00262633

Uncompetitive procedures are overused. The competition for contracts is low.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

33%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Terminál Železný Brod - 1. etapa
Výstavba autobusových nádraží
5
Ø5 in industry
Nákup zemního plynu na Komoditní burze Praha
Zemní plyn
3
Ø3 in industry
Snížení energetické náročnosti budovy základní školy Pelechovská v Železném Brodě
Stavební práce
3
Ø5 in industry
Služby dohodce na Českomoravské komoditní burze Kladna pro centrálního zadavatele při nákupu zemního plynu
Zemní plyn
5
Ø3 in industry
Zateplení sportovní haly v Železném Brodě
Stavební práce
2
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

67%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Syner, s.r.o.
1 39,632,791
Pražská plynárenská, a.s.
1 28,287,511
Trigema Building a.s.
1 25,071,954
Rwe Energie, s.r.o.
1 11,254,815
Evosa spol. s r.o.
1 10,772,172
Other suppliers 8 19,702,031

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

61%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (1 from 0)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 3)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 3)
E-auction 0% (0 from 3)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 3)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

37%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Nákup zemního plynu na Komoditní burze Praha
Not disclosed
- 28,287,511
Sdružené služby dodávek elektrické energie pro město Železný Brod
Not disclosed
- 1,503,066

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

50%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 17%
Cancelled contracts 33%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

70%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 8% (1 from 13)
Final or estimated price not published 38% (5 from 13)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 13)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 13)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 13)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 13)
Missing call for tenders 23% (3 from 13)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 13)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 13)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

77%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 13)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 13)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 13)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 13)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 13)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 13)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 15% (2 from 13)