Small cities • 2016

Město Železný Brod

IČO 00262633

Uncompetitive procedures are overused. The competition for contracts is low.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

33%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Terminál Železný Brod - 1. etapa
Výstavba autobusových nádraží
5
Ø5 in industry
Nákup zemního plynu na Komoditní burze Praha
Zemní plyn
3
Ø3 in industry
Snížení energetické náročnosti budovy základní školy Pelechovská v Železném Brodě
Stavební práce
3
Ø5 in industry
Služby dohodce na Českomoravské komoditní burze Kladna pro centrálního zadavatele při nákupu zemního plynu
Zemní plyn
5
Ø3 in industry
Zateplení sportovní haly v Železném Brodě
Stavební práce
2
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

67%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Syner, s.r.o.
1 39,632,791
Pražská plynárenská, a.s.
1 28,287,511
Trigema Building a.s.
1 25,071,954
Rwe Energie, s.r.o.
1 11,254,815
Evosa spol. s r.o.
1 10,772,172
Other suppliers 8 19,702,031

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

61%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 33% (1 from 3)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 3)
Lots 0% (0 from 3)
E-auction 0% (0 from 3)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

37%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Nákup zemního plynu na Komoditní burze Praha
Not disclosed
28,287,511
Sdružené služby dodávek elektrické energie pro město Železný Brod
Not disclosed
1,503,066

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

50%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 17%
Cancelled contracts 33%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

70%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 8% (1 from 13)
Final or estimated price not published 38% (5 from 13)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 13)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 13)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 13)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 13)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 13)
Missing call for tenders 23% (3 from 13)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

77%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 13)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 13)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 13)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 13)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 13)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 13)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 15% (2 from 13)