Small cities • 2016

Město Blovice

IČO 00256455

Good buyer. Tender documentation is well prepared, thus there is no need to modify or cancel the procedure. Small number of firms does not recieve majority of contracts.

13.
ranking
82%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

55%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Přírodní koupací biotop Blovice
Výstavba vodních děl
5
Ø5 in industry
Výstavba sběrného dvora odpadů pro město Blovice
Stavební práce
11
Ø5 in industry
Směsný komunální odpad 2015-2016
Služby související s likvidací odpadů a odpady
4
Ø3 in industry
Dodávka zemního plynu pro město Blovice a jeho příspěvkové organizace
Zemní plyn
3
Ø3 in industry
Blovice - informační služby
Informační systémy a servery
1
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

68%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Bp Stavby Cz s.r.o.
1 9,852,760
Silba-elstav s.r.o.
1 5,251,096
Pragoplyn, a.s.
2 4,183,576
Západočeské komunální služby a.s.
1 3,999,551
Asseco Solutions, a.s.
1 2,642,600
Other suppliers 6 5,704,501

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

71%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 1)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 1)
Lots 0% (0 from 1)
E-auction 0% (0 from 1)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

89%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Dodávka elektrické energie pro město Blovice a jeho příspěvkové organizace
Předchozí zakázka bez nabídek
892,351

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

92%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 12)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 12)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 12)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 12)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 12)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 12)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 12)
Missing call for tenders 8% (1 from 12)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

83%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 12)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 12)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 12)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 12)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 12)
Supplier donating to political party 8% (1 from 12)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 25% (3 from 12)