Large cities • 2016

Město Klatovy

IČO 00255661

Buyer profile has high number of errors.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

71%
average 63%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Zatraktivnění krytého plaveckého bazénu Klatovy
Stavební práce
4
Ø5 in industry
Zateplení ZŠ Tolstého Klatovy
Stavební práce
8
Ø5 in industry
Realizace projektu EPC v objektech města Klatovy
Energetické a související služby
4
Ø3 in industry
Snížení energetické náročnosti objektu ZŠ Plánická
Stavební práce
10
Ø5 in industry
Stavební úpravy - ubytovna č.p. 743/III., Klatovy
Stavební práce
10
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

83%
average 76%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Silnice Klatovy a.s.
8 65,683,310
Aldast, spol. s r.o.
2 61,678,582
Stafiko stav s.r.o.
2 31,208,453
Enesa a.s.
1 19,880,419
Smp Cz, a.s.
1 16,799,000
Other suppliers 30 157,980,022

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

66%
average 57%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 353,229,790
Unregulated purchases 468,200,528
Total 821,430,318

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 77%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

70%
average 65%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 5%
Cancelled contracts 9%
Average requirements modifications count 0.68

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

68%
average 83%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 2% (1 from 44)
Final or estimated price not published 2% (1 from 44)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 44)
Missing supplier ID 5% (2 from 44)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 44)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 44)
Call and award notices contradict each other 2% (1 from 44)
Missing call for tenders 52% (23 from 44)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

8%
average 46%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 25% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 2.73 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

79%
average 84%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 44)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 44)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 9% (4 from 44)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 44)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 44)
Supplier donating to political party 9% (4 from 44)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 18% (8 from 44)