Large cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Klatovy

IČO 00255661

Court found serious misconduct. Buyer does not use tools to support competition.

24.
ranking
74%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

74%
average 52%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Skládka TKO Štěpánovice
Stavební úpravy pro technická díla kromě mostů, tunelů, šachet a podchodů
6
Ø4 in industry
Stavební úpravy technologie SCZT - Pod Hůrkou, Klatovy - II. etapa
Stavební práce
11
Ø5 in industry
Snížení energetické náročnosti objektu ZŠ Plánická
Stavební práce
10
Ø5 in industry
Stavební úpravy technologie SCZT Pod Hůrkou, Klatovy - II. etapa
Stavební práce
4
Ø5 in industry
Chodník Točník
Stavební práce
5
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

82%
average 70%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Silnice Klatovy a.s.
9 76,398,082
EUROVIA CS, a.s.
2 29,354,421
Klatovská stavební společnost s.r.o.
3 25,172,000
Lesní stavby, s.r.o.
3 22,030,161
STRABAG a.s.
2 17,541,810
Other suppliers 32 148,015,174

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

46%
average 71%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 21% (5 from 24)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 24)
Lots 0% (0 from 24)
E-auction 0% (0 from 24)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

67%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 550,393,896
Unregulated purchases 658,590,897
Total 1,208,984,793

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 87%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

72%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 25%
Average requirements modifications count 0.63

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

89%
average 90%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 2% (1 from 60)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 60)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 60)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 60)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 60)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 60)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 60)
Missing call for tenders 27% (16 from 60)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

74%
average 55%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 90% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.65 (average mistakes per contract)