Small cities • 2016

Svazek vodovodů a kanalizací Ivančice

IČO 49458892

Large volume of money is spent without open competition. Considerable volume of contracts goes only to few firms.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

37%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
SV Ivančice – Rosice, zajištění kvality pitné vody – zhotovitel stavby
Stavební práce na výstavbě úpraven vody
4
Ø4 in industry
Popůvky - kanalizace
Stavební práce na výstavbě kanalizace
6
Ø5 in industry
SV Ivančice – Rosice, zajištění kvality pitné vody – dodatečné práce III
Stavební práce na výstavbě úpraven vody
1
Ø4 in industry
Zlepšení kvality vod v řekách Jihlava a Svratka nad nádrží Nové Mlýny - vícepráce 10
Stavební práce na výstavbě kanalizace
1
Ø5 in industry
Zlepšení kvality vod v řekách Jihlava a Svratka nad nádrží Nové Mlýny - vícepráce 12
Stavební práce na výstavbě kanalizace
1
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

6%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Ohl Žs, a.s.
22 423,027,001
Eurovia Cs, a.s.
3 46,270,193
Ap Investing, s.r.o.
1 11,933,600
Inženýrské stavby Jebáček s.r.o.
1 7,290,321
Vodohospodářský rozvoj a výstavba a.s.
3 2,369,000
Other suppliers 1 900,000

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

71%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 0)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 1)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 1)
E-auction 0% (0 from 1)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 1)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

24%
average 84%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 1.00

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

93%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 31)
Final or estimated price not published 61% (19 from 31)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 31)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 31)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 31)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 31)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 31)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 31)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 31)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

99%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 31)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 31)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 31)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 31)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 31)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 31)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 6% (2 from 31)