Small cities • 2016

Město Úvaly

IČO 00240931

The competition for contracts is low. Buyer supports competition by providing extended deadlines for tender submissions.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

23%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Provozování vodovodu a kanalizace pro veřejnou potřebu města Úvaly
Sbírání odpadních vod
3
Ø5 in industry
Mateřská škola Cukrovar
Stavební práce
4
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce objektu č.p. 65 nabízející volnočasové aktivity
Stavební úpravy domů
21
Ø4 in industry
Stavební úpravy budovy "C" základní školy v Úvalech
Stavební úpravy školních budov
3
Ø5 in industry
"Město Úvaly – Poskytnutí dlouhodobého úvěru"
Poskytování úvěrů
1
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

32%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Stavokomplet spol.s r.o.
1 177,982,000
Walco Cz spol. s r.o.
1 19,975,350
Domistav Cz a.s.
2 19,153,002
Pozemstav Prostějov,a.s.
1 15,388,815
Langerone, Se
2 10,276,017
Other suppliers 9 32,029,036

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

84%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 20% (1 from 5)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 5)
Lots 0% (0 from 5)
E-auction 0% (0 from 5)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

83%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
"Město Úvaly – Poskytnutí dlouhodobého úvěru"
Krajní naléhavost
9,403,335
Sdružené služby dodávky zemního plynu pro město Úvaly
Not disclosed
2,837,600

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

65%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 17%
Average requirements modifications count 1.00

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

74%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 16)
Final or estimated price not published 38% (6 from 16)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 16)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 16)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 16)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 16)
Call and award notices contradict each other 12% (2 from 16)
Missing call for tenders 6% (1 from 16)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

69%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 16)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 16)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 16)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 16)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 16)
Supplier donating to political party 6% (1 from 16)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 12% (2 from 16)