Large cities • 2016

Město Břeclav

IČO 00283061

Often makes mistakes in procurement journal announcements.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

70%
average 63%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Dodavatel stavebních prací - Terminál IDS JMK Břeclav
Stavební práce
14
Ø5 in industry
Stavební úpravy ZŠ Břeclav, Kupkova; MŠ Břeclav, Na Valtické a MŠ Břeclav, Kpt. Nálepky – Zateplení a výměna výplní otvorů
Stavební práce
11
Ø5 in industry
Speciální hasičské vozidlo
Hasičská vozidla
2
Ø2 in industry
Město Břeclav - služby uživatelům ICT
Servery
1
Ø2 in industry
Břeclav - ul. Kupkova, rekonstrukce komunikace, oprava kanalizace a vodovodu
Chodníky a jiné zpevněné povrchy
10
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

69%
average 76%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Strabag a.s.
2 53,104,150
Vispo Cz. s.r.o.
2 13,504,483
Tlak Smolík s.r.o.
3 11,569,352
Amper Market, a.s.
2 9,871,146
Stavba a údržba silnic s.r.o.
2 8,253,281
Other suppliers 20 49,015,342

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 70%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 7)
Nonprice competition 14% (1 from 7)
Lots 0% (0 from 7)
E-auction 0% (0 from 7)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

47%
average 57%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 145,986,472
Unregulated purchases 519,657,026
Total 665,643,498

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 77%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

52%
average 65%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 25%
Cancelled contracts 17%
Average requirements modifications count 0.18

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

46%
average 83%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 31)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 31)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 31)
Missing supplier ID 3% (1 from 31)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 31)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 31)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 31)
Missing call for tenders 32% (10 from 31)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

61%
average 46%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 74% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.71 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

94%
average 84%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 31)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 31)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 31)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 31)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 31)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 31)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 13% (4 from 31)