Small cities • 2016

Město Uherský Brod

IČO 00291463

Good buyer. The supplier portfolio is relatively broad.

37.
ranking
78%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

58%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Dopravní terminál Uherský Brod – II. etapa
Stavby sloužící dopravě
11
Ø5 in industry
Výběr provozovatele ČOV města Uherský Brod
Provoz čistíren vody
2
Ø3 in industry
Rekonstrukce domů č.p. 135,136 – Městský úřad Uherský Brod
Stavební práce
8
Ø5 in industry
Revitalizace Masarykova náměstí v Uherském Brodě
Stavební práce
5
Ø5 in industry
„Zlepšení systému povodňové služby a preventivní protipovodňové ochrany pro město Uherský Brod a mikroregion Horní Poolšaví – Varovný informační systém (VIS)“
Elektrické strojní zařízení, přístroje, zařízení a spotřební materiál, osvětlení
3
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

83%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Hochtief Cz a. s.
1 55,562,359
Slovácké vodárny a kanalizace, a. s.
1 51,295,000
Stamos Uherské Hradiště, spol. s r.o.
3 45,939,390
Sates Morava spol. s r.o.
2 32,616,801
Rumpold Uhb, s.r.o.
8 23,011,578
Other suppliers 28 135,946,170

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

87%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 50% (11 from 22)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 22)
Lots 41% (9 from 22)
E-auction 9% (2 from 22)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 84%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

57%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 3%
Cancelled contracts 32%
Average requirements modifications count 1.29

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

88%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 44)
Final or estimated price not published 2% (1 from 44)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 44)
Missing supplier ID 2% (1 from 44)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 44)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 44)
Call and award notices contradict each other 2% (1 from 44)
Missing call for tenders 16% (7 from 44)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

92%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 44)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 44)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 5% (2 from 44)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 44)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 44)
Supplier donating to political party 7% (3 from 44)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 5% (2 from 44)