Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Žatec

IČO 00265781

The competition for contracts is low. Small number of firms does not recieve majority of contracts.

66.
ranking
70%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

23%
average 49%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Rekonstrukce dopravního terminálu v Žatci
Stavební úpravy objektů sloužících silniční dopravě
4
Ø6 in industry
Domov pro seniory a Pečovatelská služba v Žatci – dodatečné zateplení a výměna oken u objektů č.p. 642, 652, 845 a 852 v Žatci
Stavební práce
4
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce osvětlení a elektroinstalací Gymnázia Žatec
Elektroinstalační práce
2
Ø4 in industry
Realizace energetických úspor dodatečným zateplením MŠ v Žatci a DSS v Libočanech
Rekonstrukce budov
2
Ø4 in industry
Revitalizace památky č.p. 52 v Žatci Městská knihovna - stavební práce
Stavební práce
4
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

67%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
METALL QUATRO spol. s r.o.
4 54,711,478
Společnost pro dopravní terminál v Žatci
1 37,979,996
EKOSTAVBY Louny s.r.o.
9 24,363,225
HERKUL a.s.
3 19,296,096
Stavební a obchodní společnost Most spol. s r.o.
5 12,604,488
Other suppliers 12 29,934,718

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

61%
average 59%

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

54%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 271,173,471
Unregulated purchases 661,717,313
Total 932,890,784

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

93%
average 91%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

88%
average 77%

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

96%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 34% (12 from 35)
Final or estimated price not published 3% (1 from 35)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 35)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 35)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 35)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 35)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 35)
Missing call for tenders 6% (2 from 35)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

45%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 69% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.94 (average mistakes per contract)