Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Holice

IČO 00273571

Calls for tenders are often modified or cancelled. Buyer profile lacks mandatory machine readability.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

average 49%
Largest contracts
Rekonstrukce objektu č.p. 59
Stavební práce
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce objektu č.p. 59
Stavební práce
Ø5 in industry
Cisternové automobilové stříkačky
Ø2 in industry
ZŠ Komenského, Holubova 500, Holice. Oprava fasády objektu
Stavební práce
Ø5 in industry
ZŠ Holice Komenského Holubova 500, Holice - rekonstrukce
Stavební práce
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
KERSON spol. s r.o.
2 15,642,442
Kurštejn stavební a obchodní firma s.r.o.
2 8,996,375
WISS CZECH, s.r.o.
1 5,915,600

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 67% (2 from 3)
Nonprice competition 67% (2 from 3)
Lots 0% (0 from 3)
E-auction 0% (0 from 3)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 81,959,030
Unregulated purchases 227,920,508
Total 309,879,538

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

average 91%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 67%
Average requirements modifications count 0.33

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 7)
Final or estimated price not published 14% (1 from 7)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 7)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 7)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 7)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 7)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 7)
Missing call for tenders 14% (1 from 7)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 40% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 2.60 (average mistakes per contract)