Small cities • 2016

Město Hluboká nad Vltavou

IČO 00244899

Uncompetitive procedures are overused. The competition for contracts is low.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

26%
average 59%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

48%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Metrostav a.s.
4 66,088,730
Protom Strakonice, s.r.o.
2 32,575,138
Colas Cz, a.s.
2 14,040,184
Zvánovec a.s.
2 13,336,332
Hydro & Kov s.r.o.
1 9,222,222
Other suppliers 1 3,837,117

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 2)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 2)
Lots 0% (0 from 2)
E-auction 0% (0 from 2)
Inovativni 0% ( from 2)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

2%
average 84%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

83%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 12)
Final or estimated price not published 67% (8 from 12)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 12)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 12)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 12)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 12)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 12)
Zakazka nema viteznou cenu 0% ( from 12)
Cena byla aktualizovana 0% ( from 12)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

98%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 12)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 12)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 12)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 12)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 12)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 12)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 8% (1 from 12)