Large cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Jindřichův Hradec

IČO 00246875

Good buyer. Enough firms are competing for contracts. Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality.

4.
ranking
81%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

74%
average 52%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

77%
average 70%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
ČSAD Jindřichův Hradec a.s.
1 99,000,000
AVE CZ odpadové hospodářství s.r.o.
2 62,120,448
JINDŘICHOHRADECKÉ MONTÁŽE s.r.o.
10 51,216,229
SWIETELSKY stavební s.r.o.
8 33,510,875
I. Kamenická stavební a obchodní firma s.r.o.
2 19,422,714
Other suppliers 43 124,118,253

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

71%
average 71%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 39% (11 from 28)
Nonprice competition 64% (18 from 28)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 28)
E-auction 0% (0 from 28)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 28)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

69%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 588,984,390
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 648,812,957
Total 1,237,797,346

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

98%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Stavební úpravy staré radnice čp. 88/I Jindřichův Hradec - dodatečné práce I.
Additional works
- 2,201,003
TRIGON-Rozhledna Rýdův kopec Děbolín - Jindřichův Hradec - Dodatečné práce I
Technical exclusivity , Emergency , Additional works
- 53,035

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

86%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 14%
Average requirements modifications count 0.11

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

85%
average 90%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 8% (5 from 64)
Final or estimated price not published 2% (1 from 64)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 64)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 64)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 64)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 64)
Missing call for tenders 25% (16 from 64)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 64)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 64)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

70%
average 55%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 82% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.48 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 60 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders