Large cities • 2016

Město Vyškov

IČO 00292427

Buyer does not modify or cancel tenders which fosters competition. Lot of money goes into historical contracts and unregulated purchases.

24.
ranking
73%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

53%
average 63%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Vyškov - železniční stanice, P&R
Výstavba železničních terminálů
6
Ø4 in industry
Zateplení a výměna oken objektu Pečovatelské služby Vyškov
Stavební práce
3
Ø5 in industry
Výstavba RD – sídliště Víta Nejedlého, Vyškov
Stavební práce pro vodovodní a kanalizační potrubí
3
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce a oprava smuteční obřadní síně v Dědicích
Výstavba společenských, správních a kulturních center
2
Ø2 in industry
Povodňový varovný systém města Vyškova
Systémy pro veřejný rozhlas
3
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

71%
average 76%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Eurovia Cs, a.s.
1 14,899,291
Vašstav, s.r.o.
1 8,699,484
Trasko, a.s.
1 8,152,324
Bs - Imex, spol. s r.o.
1 5,630,077
Tomáš Mikula
1 5,273,323
Other suppliers 7 10,657,725

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

71%
average 70%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 3)
Nonprice competition 33% (1 from 3)
Lots 33% (1 from 3)
E-auction 0% (0 from 3)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

32%
average 57%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 57,520,321
Unregulated purchases 501,116,599
Total 558,636,920

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

64%
average 77%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Dostavba nebytových prostor objektu nám. Čsl. armády 1, Vyškov
Dodatečné práce
2,123,415

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 65%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 25%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

81%
average 83%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 12)
Final or estimated price not published 17% (2 from 12)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 12)
Missing supplier ID 8% (1 from 12)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 12)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 12)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 12)
Missing call for tenders 8% (1 from 12)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

60%
average 46%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 64% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.29 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

98%
average 84%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 12)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 12)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 12)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 12)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 12)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 12)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 17% (2 from 12)