Large cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Vyškov

IČO 00292427

Buyer recieves unusually small ammount of bids. Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

4%
average 52%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Rekonstrukce domu Žižkova 1, 3, 5 Vyškov
Restoration work
2
Ø4 in industry
Oprava Masarykova náměstí, Vyškov
Construction work for pipelines, communication and power lines
4
Ø7 in industry
Ul. Hřbitovní a Cukrovarská - stavební úpravy

4
Ø9 in industry
Regenerace - úpravy sídliště Smetanovo nábřeží - V. etapa
Construction work for pipelines, communication and power lines
3
Ø7 in industry
Konsolidace IT a nové elektronické služby MěÚ Vyškov (opakovaná)

1
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

50%
average 70%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
JIMI Electronic Solutions, s.r.o.
1 27,557,355
EUROVIA CS, a.s.
2 25,397,490
MROZEK a.s.
1 22,926,919
K-net Technical International Group, s.r.o.
2 4,606,327
Konica Minolta Bussines Solutions Czech, spol. s r.o.
1 688,650
Other suppliers 2 549,800

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

82%
average 71%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 50% (2 from 4)
Nonprice competition 50% (3 from 6)
Division into lots 17% (1 from 6)
E-auction 0% (0 from 6)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 6)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

36%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 132,442,085
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 877,427,280
Total 1,009,869,366

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 87%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

79%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 17%
Average requirements modifications count 0.67

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 90%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 8)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 8)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 8)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 8)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 8)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 8)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 8)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 8)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 8)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

94%
average 55%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.25 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 8 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders