Small cities • 2016

Svaz vodovodů a kanalizací Žďársko

IČO 43383513

Enough firms are competing for contracts. Buyer does not modify or cancel tenders which fosters competition.

71.
ranking
75%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

91%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Jámy – ČOV a kanalizace
Stavební práce na výstavbě kanalizace
21
Ø5 in industry
Kanalizace Domanín, 2.etapa
Kanalizace
18
Ø6 in industry
ŽĎÁR NAD SÁZAVOU, NÁM. REPUBLIKY A UL. HORNÍ - rekonstrukce vodovodu a kanalizace
Stavební práce na výstavbě kanalizačních sítí
11
Ø5 in industry
Velké Meziříčí - Rekonstrukce kanalizace ul. Nábřeží- sběrač B, úsek RŠ 3011-3016
Stavební práce na výstavbě kanalizačních sítí
6
Ø5 in industry
Žďár nad Sázavou- Rekonstrukce vodovodu a kanalizace
Stavební práce pro vodovodní a kanalizační potrubí
11
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

70%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Kvis Pardubice a.s.
1 27,023,574
Sph stavby s.r.o.
1 24,882,686
Jcz, s.r.o.
3 23,163,238
Gremis, s.r.o.
4 20,138,050
Content, s.r.o.
5 18,538,770
Other suppliers 5 20,201,082

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 3)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 3)
Lots 0% (0 from 3)
E-auction 0% (0 from 3)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

98%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Velké Meziříčí – Rekonstrukce kanalizace ul. Skřivanova, ul. U Světlé - dodatečné práce
Not disclosed
698,083

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

95%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 19)
Final or estimated price not published 5% (1 from 19)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 19)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 19)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 19)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 19)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 19)
Missing call for tenders 5% (1 from 19)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

100%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 19)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 19)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 19)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 19)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 19)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 19)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 0% (0 from 19)