Small cities • 2016

Město Tachov

IČO 00260231

Good buyer. The supplier portfolio is relatively broad. Calls for tenders are often modified or cancelled.

37.
ranking
78%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

61%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Zateplení budov Základní školy Tachov, Zárečná ulice
Tepelné izolace
3
Ø6 in industry
Rekonstrukce místní komunikace – Stadtrodská ulice v Tachově
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
7
Ø5 in industry
Rozhledna Tachov Vysoká - CZ.1.14/3.1.00/23.02696
Stavební úpravy rekreačních zařízení
7
Ø4 in industry
Nákup plynu na rok 2016
Zemní plyn
5
Ø3 in industry
Tachov, rekonstrukce Sadové ulice
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
5
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

76%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Miras - stavitelství a sanace s.r.o.
1 20,289,653
Vodohospodářské stavby, společnost s ručením omezeným
1 9,960,000
Strabag a.s.
1 9,855,537
E.on Energie, a.s.
1 7,706,314
Centropol Energy, a.s.
2 5,294,708
Other suppliers 10 25,886,052

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

79%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 25% (1 from 4)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 4)
Lots 0% (0 from 4)
E-auction 100% (4 from 4)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

99%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
VESTAVBA VÍŘIVEK BAZÉN TACHOV - DODATEČNÉ STAVEBNÍ PRÁCE
Dodatečné práce
268,905

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

50%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 43%
Average requirements modifications count 0.29

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

91%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 16)
Final or estimated price not published 19% (3 from 16)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 16)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 16)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 16)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 16)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 16)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 16)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

88%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 16)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 6% (1 from 16)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 16)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 16)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 16)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 16)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 0% (0 from 16)