Large cities • 2016

Statutární město České Budějovice

IČO 00244732

Good buyer. Buyer profile is in relatively good shape.

9.
ranking
76%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

73%
average 63%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
KOMUNITNÍ CENTRUM NA SÍDLIŠTI MÁJ ČESKÉ BUDĚJOVICE
Výstavba víceúčelových budov
10
Ø4 in industry
REGENERACE SÍDLIŠTĚ MÁJ - ÚSEK 02
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
7
Ø5 in industry
Nákup el. energie pro statutární město České Budějovice a jeho příspěvkové organizace
Elektrická energie
5
Ø4 in industry
TECHNICKÉ VYBAVENÍ ULICE DOBROVODSKÁ, ÚSEK PLYNÁRENSKÁ - DRUŽSTEVNÍ, ČESKÉ BUDĚJOVICE
Demolice a zemní práce
7
Ø4 in industry
REGENERACE SÍDLIŠTĚ MÁJ - ČÁST 01B - STAVBA 01 A STAVBA 02
Stavební úpravy pro komunikace
12
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

88%
average 76%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Hochtief Cz a. s.
13 112,836,726
Swietelsky stavební s.r.o.
11 74,917,713
Eurovia Cs, a.s.
8 61,714,430
Strabag a.s.
9 55,258,021
Arstav s.r.o.
4 49,397,611
Other suppliers 88 380,103,349

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

70%
average 70%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (18 from 0)
Nonprice competition 3% (1 from 38)
Division into lots 8% (3 from 38)
E-auction 3% (1 from 38)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 38)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

56%
average 57%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 749,564,837
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 1,643,359,188
Total 2,392,924,025

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

70%
average 77%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Provozování, údržba, servis a opravy systému řízení dopravy sestávajícího z dopravní řídící ústředny VRS 5000 a instalovaných řadičů světelné dopravní signalizace na území města České Budějovice
Jediný dodavatel (technické důvody)
- 6,974,852
REGENERACE SÍDLIŠTĚ MÁJ - ÚSEK 02
Dodatečné práce
- 3,978,267
PŘELOŽKA SILNIC II/156 A II/157, 2. ETAPA, ČÁST 2.2 – LIKVIDACE KONTAMINOVANÉ ZEMINY
Krajní naléhavost
- 3,947,206
Nové Roudné – 1.etapa, část 2
Dodatečné práce
- 2,488,504
KOMUNITNÍ CENTRUM NA SÍDLIŠTI MÁJ, ČESKÉ BUDĚJOVICE
Dodatečné práce
- 2,295,197

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

68%
average 65%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 5%
Cancelled contracts 13%
Average requirements modifications count 0.62

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

89%
average 83%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 133)
Final or estimated price not published 2% (3 from 133)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 133)
Missing supplier ID 4% (5 from 133)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 133)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 133)
Missing call for tenders 8% (11 from 133)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 133)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 133)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

78%
average 46%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 86% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.39 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

93%
average 84%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 133)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 2% (3 from 133)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 133)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 133)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 133)
Supplier donating to political party 3% (4 from 133)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 15% (20 from 133)