Small cities • 2016

Město Boskovice

IČO 00279978

Suppliers showing "red flags" are seen quite often. Considerable volume of contracts goes only to few firms.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

69%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
„Sportovní hala Boskovice, ul. Slovákova“
Výstavba sportovních hal
7
Ø4 in industry
Boskovice Nemocnice - zateplení komplementu a víceúčelového objektu a instalace tepelných čerpadel
Opláštění budov
5
Ø6 in industry
"Sportovní hala Boskovice, ul. Slovákova" - dodatečné stavební práce
Výstavba sportovních hal
1
Ø4 in industry
ÚDRŽBA VEŘEJNÉ ZELENĚ V BOSKOVICÍCH
Služby vysazování a údržby zelených ploch
7
Ø5 in industry
Konsolidace IT a nové služby TC ORP Boskovice – Konsolidace IT TC ORP Boskovice
Informační systémy a servery
2
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

38%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Imos Brno, a.s.
2 43,429,834
Stavkom, spol. s r. o.
1 20,498,298
Ab Facility a.s.
1 2,853,458
Z + M Partner, spol. s r.o.
1 2,376,000
Hanes s.r.o.
1 1,649,587
Other suppliers 11 7,157,430

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

61%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 67% (2 from 3)
Nonprice competition 33% (1 from 3)
Lots 0% (0 from 3)
E-auction 0% (0 from 3)
Inovativni 0% ( from 3)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

77%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Puvodni zakazka (Kč) Zmena zavazku / JRBU (Kč)
"Sportovní hala Boskovice, ul. Slovákova" - dodatečné stavební práce
Dodatečné práce
- 4,992,352

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

63%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 25%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.50

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

86%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 17)
Final or estimated price not published 65% (11 from 17)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 17)
Missing supplier ID 6% (1 from 17)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 17)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 17)
Missing call for tenders 6% (1 from 17)
Zakazka nema viteznou cenu 0% ( from 17)
Cena byla aktualizovana 0% ( from 17)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

71%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 17)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 17)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 12% (2 from 17)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 17)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 17)
Supplier donating to political party 6% (1 from 17)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 29% (5 from 17)