Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Boskovice

IČO 00279978

Buyer recieves unusually small ammount of bids. Lot of money goes into historical contracts and unregulated purchases.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

25%
average 49%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Nemocnice Boskovice – rekonstrukce lůžkové části ARO
Rekonstrukce budov
3
Ø4 in industry
Přístavba mateřské školy Bílkova č. 19, Boskovice
Stavební úpravy budov sloužících vzdělání a výzkumu
3
Ø4 in industry
ÚDRŽBA VEŘEJNÉ ZELENĚ V BOSKOVICÍCH
Zahradnické služby
2
Ø5 in industry
Konsolidace IT a nové služby TC ORP Boskovice – Konsolidace IT TC ORP Boskovice
Informační systémy a servery
2
Ø2 in industry
NB - rekonstrukce únikové cesty hlavní budovy 1. ETAPA
Stavební práce
2
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

44%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
STAVKOM, spol. s r.o.
2 27,459,967
SKR stav, s.r.o.
1 19,091,665
AB Facility a.s.
1 3,581,190
Z + M Partner, spol. s r.o.
1 2,376,000
Hasičská vzájemná pojišťovna, a.s.
2 2,111,936
Other suppliers 5 3,504,166

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

71%
average 59%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 67% (2 from 3)
Nonprice competition 67% (2 from 3)
Lots 0% (0 from 3)
E-auction 0% (0 from 3)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

46%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 130,998,880
Unregulated purchases 482,912,444
Total 613,911,324

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 91%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

58%
average 77%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 33%
Average requirements modifications count 1.33

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

93%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 10)
Final or estimated price not published 30% (3 from 10)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 10)
Missing supplier ID 10% (1 from 10)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 10)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 10)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 10)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 10)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

53%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 67% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.56 (average mistakes per contract)