Small cities • 2016

Obec Šestajovice

IČO 00240851

Often makes mistakes in procurement journal announcements. Buyer does not modify or cancel tenders which fosters competition.

108.
ranking
73%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

69%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Rekonstrukce a nástavba Základní školy v obci Šestajovice
Práce na fasádách
Not disclosed
Ø4 in industry
Školní tělocvična - Šestajovice
Výstavba sportovních hal
Not disclosed
Ø4 in industry
Rekonstrukce místních komunikací v obci Šestajovice
Stavební práce
6
Ø5 in industry
SNÍŽENÍ ENERGETICKÉ NÁROČNOSTI OBJEKTU OBECNÍHO ÚŘADU V ŠESTAJOVICÍCH
Stavební práce
5
Ø5 in industry
Svoz a odstranění odpadu 2014/15 - Šestajovice
Sběr odpadu
2
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

46%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Konstruktis Novostav a.s.
1 30,676,033
Zlínské stavby, a.s.
1 14,788,439
Strabag a.s.
1 5,608,683
Z & D stavební společnost spol. s r.o.
1 3,880,535
Ave Cz odpadové hospodářství s.r.o.
1 2,969,618
Other suppliers 3 3,638,679

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

61%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (1 from 0)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 2)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 2)
E-auction 0% (0 from 2)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 2)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

97%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Rekonstrukce ZŠ Šestajovice - prováděcí dokumentace
Not disclosed
- 420,000

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

88%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.50

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

49%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 38% (3 from 8)
Final or estimated price not published 25% (2 from 8)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 8)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 8)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 8)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 8)
Missing call for tenders 12% (1 from 8)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 8)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 8)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

75%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 8)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 8)
Supplier donating to political party 12% (1 from 8)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 12% (1 from 8)