Small cities • 2018 • past ranking

Město Polička

IČO 00277177

The supplier portfolio is relatively broad. Calls for tenders are often modified or cancelled.

34.
ranking
74%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

45%
average 49%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
„Stavba bytových domů v pasivním standardu včetně přípojek a terénních úprav, I. etapa lokality Bezručova v Poličce a s ní související projektová a inženýrská činnost”

3
Ø4 in industry
Intenzifikace ČOV Polička
Construction works for sewage treatment plants, purification plants and refuse incineration plants
4
Ø5 in industry
I. etapa technické a dopravní infrastruktury lokality pro bydlení Bezručova v Poličce

16
Ø7 in industry
Rekonstrukce krytého plaveckého bazénu v Poličce – 5. etapa
Construction work
4
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce ul. Šaffova a Tylova v Poličce
Construction, foundation and surface works for highways, roads
1
Ø7 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

82%
average 55%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
PRIMA spol. s r.o.
1 25,844,327
ASTING CZ PASIVNÍ DOMY s.r.o.
1 25,844,327
AGILE spol. s r.o.
2 25,266,727
Dlažba Vysoké Mýto, s.r.o.
4 20,248,297
STROJÍRNY A OPRAVNY MILENOV spol. s r.o.
1 20,246,831
Other suppliers 12 77,444,673

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

71%
average 59%

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

67%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 236,961,258
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 294,108,321
Total 531,069,579

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

98%
average 91%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

62%
average 77%

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

95%
average 91%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 17)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 17)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 17)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 17)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 17)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 17)
Missing call for tenders 12% (2 from 17)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 17)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 17)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

42%
average 38%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 75% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.31 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 16 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders