Small cities • 2016

Město Bruntál

IČO 00295892

Procurement journal misses vital information (prices, suppliers..). Applicants are discouraged by frequent competition modifications and cancellations.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

70%
average 59%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Rekonstrukce kulturní památky PETRIN - centrum vzdělávání a volného času v Bruntále
Rekonstrukce budov
7
Ø5 in industry
Dopravní přestupní terminál na ulici Nádražní v Bruntále
Výstavba autobusových nádraží
8
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce a modernizace stávající jednotné kanalizace na ul. V Aleji a ul. Smetanova v Bruntále
Stavební práce pro vodovodní a kanalizační potrubí
8
Ø5 in industry
RPS - Bruntál, sídliště Květná - I. etapa
Chodníky a jiné zpevněné povrchy
2
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce kulturní památky PETRIN – centrum vzdělávání a volného času v Bruntále - doplnění
Rekonstrukce budov
1
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

50%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
Metrostav a.s.
3 89,567,409
Kareta s.r.o.
8 84,420,953
Stavba Šafrán s.r.o.
3 15,590,000
Jr Stakr s.r.o.
2 11,949,423
Svovaltrend s.r.o.
2 6,693,000
Other suppliers 11 23,606,914

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

82%
average 64%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 6)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 6)
Lots 33% (2 from 6)
E-auction 67% (4 from 6)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

65%
average 84%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

48%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 54%
Average requirements modifications count 0.70

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

48%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 10% (3 from 29)
Final or estimated price not published 0% (0 from 29)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 29)
Missing supplier ID 0% (0 from 29)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 29)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 29)
Call and award notices contradict each other 3% (1 from 29)
Missing call for tenders 28% (8 from 29)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

94%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 29)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 29)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 3% (1 from 29)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 29)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 29)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 29)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 24% (7 from 29)