Large cities • 2016

Město Litoměřice

IČO 00263958

Considerable volume of contracts goes only to few firms.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

47%
average 63%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Litoměřice – modernizace a dostavba autobusového nádraží I. etapa
Výstavba autobusových nádraží
5
Ø5 in industry
Obnova parku Jiráskovy sady v Litomeřicích
Stavební práce
4
Ø5 in industry
Zateplení ZŠ Havlíčkova Litoměřice
Stavební úpravy školních budov
4
Ø5 in industry
Zateplení a výměna otvorových výplní ZŠ U Stadionu a MŠ Masarykova
Stavební práce
4
Ø5 in industry
Sdružené služby dodávky plynu a elektřiny
Ropné produkty, paliva, elektrická energie a ostatní zdroje energie
5
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

49%
average 76%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Chládek & Tintěra, a.s.
8 115,207,991
Gabriel s.r.o.
2 47,465,339
Centropol Energy, a.s.
2 28,179,917
Vemex Energie a.s.
2 14,089,958
Metall Quatro spol. s r.o.
2 9,715,929
Other suppliers 13 21,316,366

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

89%
average 70%

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

61%
average 57%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 238,226,501
Zakazky maleho rozsahu 0
Unregulated purchases 391,929,572
Total 630,156,073

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

96%
average 77%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

40%
average 65%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 7%
Cancelled contracts 21%
Average requirements modifications count 1.83

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

77%
average 83%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 3% (1 from 29)
Final or estimated price not published 34% (10 from 29)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 29)
Missing supplier ID 3% (1 from 29)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 29)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 29)
Missing call for tenders 7% (2 from 29)
Zakazka nema viteznou cenu 0% ( from 29)
Cena byla aktualizovana 0% ( from 29)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

58%
average 46%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 61% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.22 (average mistakes per contract)
Uveřejňují se na profilu zakázky malého rozsahu? (Poměřujeme proti počtu zakázek v režimu zákona)
0-250K 0 zakázek
250K-500K 0 zakázek
500K-1000K 0 zakázek
1000K+ 0 zakázek

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

99%
average 84%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 29)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 29)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 29)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 29)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 29)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 29)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 10% (3 from 29)