City parts • 2016

Městská část Praha 2

IČO 00063461

Procurement journal misses vital information (prices, suppliers..).

11.
ranking
68%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

60%
average 53%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

82%
average 63%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Swietelsky stavební s.r.o.
1 91,899,900
Delta final s.r.o.
3 38,178,050
Isco spol. s r.o.
2 24,807,179
Hubáček & Samek (h & S), spol. s r.o.
2 24,721,688
Ag-real s.r.o.
2 17,689,697
Other suppliers 37 172,372,309

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

78%
average 62%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 46% (6 from 13)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 13)
Lots 15% (2 from 13)
E-auction 8% (1 from 13)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

74%
average 81%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Price (Kč)
Zajištění dodávky tepla a teplé vody v objektech MČ Praha 2
Krajní naléhavost
21,041,951
Zajištění oprav zdrojů tepla a souvisejících dodávek služeb
Not disclosed
4,900,000
Nákup LAN infrastruktury
Not disclosed
1,811,000
ZŠ Botičská 8/130, Praha 2 - dodávka a výstavba nafukovací haly
Dodatečné práce
200,000
Pojištění odpovědnosti zastupitelů městské části Praha 2
Not disclosed
200,000

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

73%
average 67%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 5%
Cancelled contracts 6%
Average requirements modifications count 0.56

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

61%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 47)
Final or estimated price not published 21% (10 from 47)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 47)
Missing supplier ID 9% (4 from 47)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 47)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 47)
Call and award notices contradict each other 2% (1 from 47)
Missing call for tenders 15% (7 from 47)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

85%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 2% (1 from 47)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 47)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 47)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 47)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 47)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 47)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 36% (17 from 47)