City parts • 2018 • past ranking

Městská část Praha 2

IČO 00063461

Buyer has seriously violated procurement law. Buyer profile is in relatively good shape.

12.
ranking
71%
zIndex

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

57%
average 42%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Vybudování zařízení pro poskytování péče o děti do 3 let v MČ Praha 2
Stavební práce
4
Ø5 in industry
ZŠ Resslova 10/2097 – výměna oken (trojskla) I. etapa a vybudování vchodu k jídelnímu bloku
Rekonstrukce budov
4
Ø4 in industry
ZŠ Kladská 1/1201 – vybudování jídelny ve vnitrobloku
Rekonstrukce budov
2
Ø4 in industry
Plavecká 402/10 - výměna oken
Instalace a montáž dveří a oken a souvisejících výrobků
7
Ø6 in industry
Folimanka - rekonstrukce části parku - Sluneční stráň
Krajinné úpravy
3
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

86%
average 63%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume (Kč)
KyraStav spol. s r.o.
3 39,495,411
AG-REAL s.r.o.
3 25,665,634
Delta final, s.r.o
6 25,452,713
TRUSTAV s.r.o.
3 22,398,467
Mgr. Alena Řeňdovská, advokát
3 19,102,989
Other suppliers 31 123,399,117

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

71%
average 65%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 25% (4 from 16)
Nonprice competition 12% (2 from 16)
Lots 6% (1 from 16)
E-auction 6% (1 from 16)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

88%
average 88%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

80%
average 76%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 13%
Average requirements modifications count 1.25

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

73%
average 89%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 2% (1 from 42)
Final or estimated price not published 14% (6 from 42)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 42)
Missing supplier ID 2% (1 from 42)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 42)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 42)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 42)
Missing call for tenders 12% (5 from 42)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

56%
average 33%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 77% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.85 (average mistakes per contract)