Large cities • 2016

Statutární město Liberec

IČO 00262978

Lot of money goes into historical contracts and unregulated purchases.

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

63%
average 63%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

83%
average 76%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Unistav a.s.
4 78,201,635
Eurovia Cs, a.s.
3 63,437,628
Kooperativa pojišťovna, a.s., Vienna Insurance Group
1 36,814,656
Integra stavby, a.s.
3 35,344,954
Nisainvest, spol. s r.o.
3 24,491,990
Other suppliers 36 173,701,933

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

39%
average 57%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 412,421,799
Unregulated purchases 2,303,002,255
Total 2,715,424,054

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

85%
average 77%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

64%
average 65%
Type of flaw Result
Issued calls without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 26%
Average requirements modifications count 0.42

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

96%
average 83%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 50)
Final or estimated price not published 14% (7 from 50)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 50)
Missing supplier ID 4% (2 from 50)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 50)
Wrong buyer name 0% (0 from 50)
Call and award notices contradict each other 0% (0 from 50)
Missing call for tenders 2% (1 from 50)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

54%
average 46%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 57% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.25 (average mistakes per contract)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

98%
average 84%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 50)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 50)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 2% (1 from 50)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 50)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 50)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 50)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 6% (3 from 50)